Pretty amazing that a car flipped at highway speeds and nobody was significantly harm. Are any expenses pending against the horse owner? I don't want to cast aspersions with out evidence, so I won't title the enterprise, nevertheless it appears fairly obvious a guess that the horses had been at a certain ranch and escaped. If that's the case, the house owners likely board them there and the accountability belongs with the ranch. May not be the proprietor's/homeowners' fault. Sure, the vast majority of horses in the realm are boarded, not stabled on horse proprietor property. Pretty https://just6f.com/statues/ terrible time for those drivers, although. This is terrible, & it may've been even worse. The property on each sides belongs to Stanford U. PVEC is a bunch of sub-barns and there's at the very least one if no more extra operations farther up Ansel Lane. 280 the horses would have come from. May you imagine that somebody intended their horses to be killed on the freeway? Too dangerous it took the CHP an hour to forged the SIG alert - it seems they didn't react in time to prevent persevering with tragedy? Only for the document they didn't come from PVTC! So solid all the aspersions you want! I didn't "blame" anyone, nor did I "imagine" someone wished hurt, notice my use of the word "escape". I still doubt that would be the case. I used to be referring to @wonderful that thought the house owners would be liable. As for my guess, after trying on the map, I am glad I didn't say the name, the one I was guessing is on the south side of 280, with the long lease. You'd want greater than a handful of fingers to count. My error stems from being a north peninsula gal, I nonetheless think of 280 as north/south! The information reported this morning that they bought loose from Webb Ranch. I am extra familiar with the south aspect stables; I don't know which is the obvious (ie.. Someone thought they had latched a gate, but hadn't. The SJ Mercury Information studies that they wandered a mile from the corral where a gate was left free. Mea culpa -- I used to be reacting defensively in safety of the ranch I rode at as a child (WR) which is on the "south" side of 280. From what I do know, all their horses are additionally on the other side of the creek from the 280 north on- ramp. There are going to be a variety of unhappy children as well as us adult horse lovers. I'm feeling very dangerous for the ranch and all the kids who rode these horses in classes. I am not feeling as unhealthy for the ranch owners & youngsters who rode the horses as I'm feeling for the horses themselves & the poor individuals who hit them. Glad no human lives were lost and very sad for the lack of the horses. Sorry for my reactivity in earlier submit. Shocked anyone would blame the horse owners. Hazards like deer (and, up to now, horses and cattle and even pedestrians and stalled cars) appear on 280. I attempt not to drive in the shoulder lane, especially at evening, to provide myself more room to maneuver ought to a deer sure into the roadway. Many of us use 280 as a speedway! What are they going to do in the event that they hit a deer - sue the deer? I am a very long time Woodside and Portola Valley Resident. For the previous 15 years I have had cause to be on the 280 between the hours of 4:30-6:30am and i can tell you not many maintain the speed restrict. Speed and over driving the reach of headlights are seemingly culprits, so please do not blame the poor horses and their homeowners. It's as if drivers think that few drivers on the highway make it the Autobahn! They need to deal with it as though they are driving in icy conditions - Decelerate. The speed limit is about as the safe pace beneath supreme circumstances, which incorporates daylight, something less than superb requires slower speeds. Perhaps if the CHP would spend more time in the early hours monitoring visitors we might have less gridlock that begins with wildlife (or comparatively just lately domesticated animals) being hit and killed.
